Toadfish Monastery

Open Water => Forum Stuff => Announcements => Topic started by: Swatopluk on January 21, 2009, 11:29:46 AM

Title: Lectors wanted
Post by: Swatopluk on January 21, 2009, 11:29:46 AM
Hi!
I am just two songs short of finishing my fourth Choral Squid Songbook and plan to combine all of them (i.e. a full 100) in an omnibus. But as you all know, once you type so much stuff there are inevitavly to be errors in it, from simple typos to grammar and language errors. There are also some artistic judgements postponed on some lines/words. Additionally a general check on the accuracy of the origins of the originals would be helpful.

So I would appreciate it, if all the siblings would help me to iron out those.
Who is willing to help?

Warning: Some might consider the parodying (parrot dying?  ;) ) of some songs to be inappropriate and I did some quite nasty things there.


Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Pachyderm on January 21, 2009, 03:27:36 PM
Count me in.
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: beagle on January 22, 2009, 09:01:33 PM
I've been notoriously bad at getting round to it in the past, but might be able to vet a few.
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Scriblerus the Philosophe on January 23, 2009, 04:56:40 AM
I'll beta, if you so wish.
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Aggie on January 27, 2009, 05:35:30 AM
Admittedly, and unfortunately, I have not even got 'round to your thesis.  :P

Otherwise I'd love to help, at least on error.  No artistic judgments here.  ;)


(I am scarce on reading time these days - I cannot even finish the magazine I'm subscribed to before the next edition shows up in the mailbox  :-[ I mean really - a freakin magazine)
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Swatopluk on January 27, 2009, 08:58:46 AM
I just posted the last ones and now will try to prepare the pdf for the omnibus.
Is somebody here talented enough to sketch an Omnibus ((http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:Ia8szLBjHHmgeM:http://www.schulbilder.org/omnibus-t3089.jpg)) steered by Cthulhu ((http://tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:_XTTzk3Ax86ltM:http://bp0.blogger.com/_ThLc0iQSAVk/Ru1Y0l9DufI/AAAAAAAAAJc/AvhdE2iTfAo/s320/cthulhu_scooter_blog.jpg))?
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Swatopluk on January 28, 2009, 09:19:48 AM
OK, here's the title page
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Pachyderm on January 28, 2009, 11:10:50 AM
Personally, I would remove the That Is, and make the writing  under the picture italicised and much smaller, with a fake "quotation" from an Elder One.

But that's just me. I love the picture, though.
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Swatopluk on January 28, 2009, 11:45:55 AM
The "that is" is actually an allusion to the Luther Bible  :mrgreen:
Biblia/That is the/Whole Bible/German...

It's just the first attempt

That picture took a lot of work, given that I only had MS Paint and a few downloaded images at my disposure

http://www.ub.uni-leipzig.de/img/die_ubl/sosa/rundgang/gross/186lufft.jpg
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Pachyderm on January 30, 2009, 04:55:07 PM
See,this is where my basic lack of religious knowledge lets me down...

Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Swatopluk on February 12, 2009, 10:02:48 AM
OK, here's the finished version ready for lectoring and criticism
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Scriblerus the Philosophe on February 12, 2009, 10:49:51 PM
These are pretty much epic.  :mrgreen: Relatively little to correct/ask about so far, I think.

QuoteMain inspiration are of course The Call of Cthulhu and Shadow over Innsmouth...
should read something like, "Main inspirations are of course The Call of Cthulhu and Shadow over Innsmouth..."

In Alhazred's Story, is it supposed to read, "IT will find me" or 'It will find me"?

I must finish beta'ing later, alas. My laundry calls and the wireless connection is tenuous at best.
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Swatopluk on February 13, 2009, 08:56:30 AM
'IT' in the same way as people write 'LOrd' at the beginning of a sentence in order to distinguish between a simple nobleman and God. For the same reason 'He' and 'HE' can be found on other occasions in the songs (referring to a Great Old One then)
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Swatopluk on February 15, 2009, 06:39:52 PM
I have to heavily update the link list. I will do so in the next few days
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Swatopluk on February 16, 2009, 09:25:24 AM
OK, here with the updated link list (I hope this will last longer but please check!)
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Scriblerus the Philosophe on February 16, 2009, 03:39:07 PM
Might want to push the song list down to it's own page.  "This really sucks! (your brain out and feeds it to Him)" that is a song list, right? Otherwise, I'm confused.

"...parodies I wrote in the past few years..." might read better as "...parodies I have written in the past few years..."
"...(and fonts) with no regards..." should read, "...(and fonts) with no regard..."

I think I shall leave the lyrics to others.
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Swatopluk on February 17, 2009, 09:12:00 AM
Quote from: Scriblerus the Philosophe on February 16, 2009, 03:39:07 PM
Might want to push the song list down to it's own page.  "This really sucks! (your brain out and feeds it to Him)" that is a song list, right? Otherwise, I'm confused.

And I am confused about your confusion  ???
I thought it was obvious that this is the (fake) ad/'voices form the press' page.
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Scriblerus the Philosophe on February 18, 2009, 02:03:52 AM
Annnnd now I don't remember why I was confused so much.
Meeybe it would be a good idea to indicate what it is, so you do not have confused Scribble-esque readers going, "wtf?"
Title: Re: Lectors wanted
Post by: Swatopluk on February 18, 2009, 08:20:03 AM
Since this book should cause madness, why should I reduce confusion?  ;)
Unfortunately there is no line left on the page for the "The Press Says" and making the letters smaller renders some of them virtually unreadable (and I refuse to go for "normal" fonts here  :mrgreen:)

Btw, it was the pure horror to get the page numbers right. Any time I changed from 1 to 2 columns or back, Word started again from page 1. I had to define the page numbers for any of these occasions. So there are actually 57 sections each "starting" with an offset in order to pretend a continuous flow from 1 to 118 to exist  >:(.