Cover pictures

[Sibling DavidH]

The charity's AGM is coming up and, as usual, I got the job of producing the cover of the Annual Report.  It's special this time, as it's our 20th anniversary, and I was given precise instructions as to what to do, leaving me discretion only in what picture to put in the O.

Here's the final version:


Originally I chose this:

taken from a shot I did some time ago of a participant (bottom) and a young volunteer.

This was accepted as fine until someone started moaning that the volunteer looks a bit unhappy.  I told them we'd never find anything as suitable in the archive, so I stomped off and grabbed another participant and a professional worker, and got them to pose for this:

Now I still believe the girl in the original one looks really lovely and the second one is nowhere near as good.

Too late, it's at the printer's now, but what do you folks think?

[The Meromorph]

Yes, the girl in the first one is lovely. 

The second one is a better photograph, and better suited to the purpose. Not because of the 'smiling thing', but because of the composition, the postural mimicing, and the facial 'similarities'. 

[Sibling Zono (anon1mat0)]

The girl in the first picture is certainly lovely, but the second one is OK.

[Swatopluk]

The '20' is a bit to off center the left

[Sibling DavidH]

The '20' is a bit to off center the left

Oops!  You're right, but it's too late now.

[Swatopluk]

You know what hay the GOP would make of that

Not to forget about the vicious gangs of Keep Left signs

http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_pictures/compdiff/keepleft.jpg

[Sibling DavidH]

Yaroogh!

[Griffin NoName]

As with the other, first girl was fine.......... but 2nd pic is a better pic. for the space

[Sibling DavidH]

Thanks for the comments, Siblings.
Swato, you're not the only one with eagle eyes - someone at the printer's noticed the error and put it right.  They were delivered today.